Tell HN: SQLite changes are not innocent
Since the news that "the SQLite project has officially adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as its Code of Conduct", I feel like it's not understood how bad things really are. Here are some gems from these Guidelines: > Hurtful or harmful language related to: > - Background > - Gender identity or expression > - Ability > - Geographic location > - Other attributes > [...] > is not acceptable. This includes deliberately referring to someone by a gender that they do not identify with, and/or questioning the legitimacy of an individual’s gender identity or > Physical contact or simulated physical contact (such as emojis like “kiss”) without affirmative consent is not acceptable. or > [...] we recognize that it is possible for actions taken outside of Mozilla’s online or inperson spaces to have a deep impact on community health. (For example, in the past, we publicly identified an anonymous posting aimed at a Mozilla employee in a non-Mozilla forum as clear grounds for removal from the Mozilla community.) It's exactly the opposite as it claims to be ('inclusiveness' and 'being save'). I don't understand how these far-reaching changes are infesting the software ecosystem. I wouldn't touch software with this political attitude with a 10-foot pole professionally. Who knows what they will chose to add next week? Reference link: https://ift.tt/2CZx9rN 0 comments on Hacker News.
Since the news that "the SQLite project has officially adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as its Code of Conduct", I feel like it's not understood how bad things really are. Here are some gems from these Guidelines: > Hurtful or harmful language related to: > - Background > - Gender identity or expression > - Ability > - Geographic location > - Other attributes > [...] > is not acceptable. This includes deliberately referring to someone by a gender that they do not identify with, and/or questioning the legitimacy of an individual’s gender identity or > Physical contact or simulated physical contact (such as emojis like “kiss”) without affirmative consent is not acceptable. or > [...] we recognize that it is possible for actions taken outside of Mozilla’s online or inperson spaces to have a deep impact on community health. (For example, in the past, we publicly identified an anonymous posting aimed at a Mozilla employee in a non-Mozilla forum as clear grounds for removal from the Mozilla community.) It's exactly the opposite as it claims to be ('inclusiveness' and 'being save'). I don't understand how these far-reaching changes are infesting the software ecosystem. I wouldn't touch software with this political attitude with a 10-foot pole professionally. Who knows what they will chose to add next week? Reference link: https://ift.tt/2CZx9rN
Since the news that "the SQLite project has officially adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as its Code of Conduct", I feel like it's not understood how bad things really are. Here are some gems from these Guidelines: > Hurtful or harmful language related to: > - Background > - Gender identity or expression > - Ability > - Geographic location > - Other attributes > [...] > is not acceptable. This includes deliberately referring to someone by a gender that they do not identify with, and/or questioning the legitimacy of an individual’s gender identity or > Physical contact or simulated physical contact (such as emojis like “kiss”) without affirmative consent is not acceptable. or > [...] we recognize that it is possible for actions taken outside of Mozilla’s online or inperson spaces to have a deep impact on community health. (For example, in the past, we publicly identified an anonymous posting aimed at a Mozilla employee in a non-Mozilla forum as clear grounds for removal from the Mozilla community.) It's exactly the opposite as it claims to be ('inclusiveness' and 'being save'). I don't understand how these far-reaching changes are infesting the software ecosystem. I wouldn't touch software with this political attitude with a 10-foot pole professionally. Who knows what they will chose to add next week? Reference link: https://ift.tt/2CZx9rN 0 comments on Hacker News.
Since the news that "the SQLite project has officially adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as its Code of Conduct", I feel like it's not understood how bad things really are. Here are some gems from these Guidelines: > Hurtful or harmful language related to: > - Background > - Gender identity or expression > - Ability > - Geographic location > - Other attributes > [...] > is not acceptable. This includes deliberately referring to someone by a gender that they do not identify with, and/or questioning the legitimacy of an individual’s gender identity or > Physical contact or simulated physical contact (such as emojis like “kiss”) without affirmative consent is not acceptable. or > [...] we recognize that it is possible for actions taken outside of Mozilla’s online or inperson spaces to have a deep impact on community health. (For example, in the past, we publicly identified an anonymous posting aimed at a Mozilla employee in a non-Mozilla forum as clear grounds for removal from the Mozilla community.) It's exactly the opposite as it claims to be ('inclusiveness' and 'being save'). I don't understand how these far-reaching changes are infesting the software ecosystem. I wouldn't touch software with this political attitude with a 10-foot pole professionally. Who knows what they will chose to add next week? Reference link: https://ift.tt/2CZx9rN
Hacker News story: Tell HN: SQLite changes are not innocent
![Hacker News story: Tell HN: SQLite changes are not innocent]()
Reviewed by Tha Kur
on
October 27, 2018
Rating:
No comments: