Ask HN: Why does Hiring thread always top out at developer?
Who is Hiring each month seems to almost entirely be filled with positions for stack specific developers. Python dev here, React dev there. "Engineer" shows up over 500 times in the March thread. "Architect" shows up 23 times. I know VPs that read HN. Where are the more senior level jobs for folks who have climbed the ladder out of writing code and are now architecting, managing teams, managing managers, directing divisions, etc? 4 comments on Hacker News.
Who is Hiring each month seems to almost entirely be filled with positions for stack specific developers. Python dev here, React dev there. "Engineer" shows up over 500 times in the March thread. "Architect" shows up 23 times. I know VPs that read HN. Where are the more senior level jobs for folks who have climbed the ladder out of writing code and are now architecting, managing teams, managing managers, directing divisions, etc?
Who is Hiring each month seems to almost entirely be filled with positions for stack specific developers. Python dev here, React dev there. "Engineer" shows up over 500 times in the March thread. "Architect" shows up 23 times. I know VPs that read HN. Where are the more senior level jobs for folks who have climbed the ladder out of writing code and are now architecting, managing teams, managing managers, directing divisions, etc? 4 comments on Hacker News.
Who is Hiring each month seems to almost entirely be filled with positions for stack specific developers. Python dev here, React dev there. "Engineer" shows up over 500 times in the March thread. "Architect" shows up 23 times. I know VPs that read HN. Where are the more senior level jobs for folks who have climbed the ladder out of writing code and are now architecting, managing teams, managing managers, directing divisions, etc?
Hacker News story: Ask HN: Why does Hiring thread always top out at developer?
![Hacker News story: Ask HN: Why does Hiring thread always top out at developer?]()
Reviewed by Tha Kur
on
March 03, 2020
Rating:
No comments: