What was the post about giving malicious users worse UX?
I can't find the post, but I remember it being posted here some time ago (months, maybe a year?). Somebody found out that it's more effective to give malicious users worse user experience (slow loads, random error messages) instead of banning them completely. 1 comments on Hacker News.
I can't find the post, but I remember it being posted here some time ago (months, maybe a year?). Somebody found out that it's more effective to give malicious users worse user experience (slow loads, random error messages) instead of banning them completely.
I can't find the post, but I remember it being posted here some time ago (months, maybe a year?). Somebody found out that it's more effective to give malicious users worse user experience (slow loads, random error messages) instead of banning them completely. 1 comments on Hacker News.
I can't find the post, but I remember it being posted here some time ago (months, maybe a year?). Somebody found out that it's more effective to give malicious users worse user experience (slow loads, random error messages) instead of banning them completely.
Hacker News story: What was the post about giving malicious users worse UX?
![Hacker News story: What was the post about giving malicious users worse UX?]()
Reviewed by Tha Kur
on
April 05, 2024
Rating:
No comments: